b. DA Form 1059 academic raters will ensure the following:
(1)
All applicable fields in parts I, II, and IV are accurate and complete.
(2)
When there are substantiated findings that the rated Soldier violated the Army’s EO, EEO, or SHARP Programs, “No” is selected in part II, block a, and comments explaining the “No” selection are entered in part II, block l.
(3)
APFT performance entry and date, height and weight requirements, and verification of compliance with AR 600–9 are entered in part II, blocks b and c.
(4)
Overall grade point average (GPA) is entered in part II, block d, when applicable.
(5)
Skill identifiers (with code) are entered in part II, blocks e1 and e2, when applicable.
(6)
Academic achievement boxes are selected in part II, blocks f through k, to indicate how well the student demonstrated performance as related to attributes and competencies of the Army’s Leadership Requirements Model (see ADP/ADRP 6–22).
The academic achievement is intended to measure a student’s academic level of demonstrated performance associated to Army attributes, core leadership competencies, and professionalism.
This measurement is derived from comparing the student’s demonstrated performance against Army attributes, core leadership competencies, and course standards.
(a)
If a student successfully achieves and maintains an overall acceptable course standard, as related to the demonstrated competency/attribute as identified in, and consistent with, course grading plans, the rater will place an “X” in the “Met Standard” box.
(b)
If a student’s academic performance is above overall standards of the course as related to the demonstrated competency/attribute identified in, and consistent with, course grading plans, the rater will place an “X” in the “Exceeded Standard” box.
(c)
If a student’s academic performance is extraordinarily above overall standards of the course as related to the demonstrated competency/attribute identified in, and consistent with, course grading plans, the rater will place an “X” in the “Far Exceeded Standard” box.
(d)
If a student does not successfully achieve and does not maintain an overall acceptable course standard as related to the demonstrated competency/attribute as identified in, and consistent with, course grading plans, the rater will place an “X” in the “Did Not Meet Standard” box.
(7)
DA Form 1059 will be referred to the student if any “Did Not Meet Standard” is selected (see paras 3–28 and 3–29).
(8)
If a competency/attribute is not assessed consistent with course grading plan, the rater will place an “X” in the “Not Evaluated” box.
(9)
Academic achievement comments will address accomplishments and/or deficiencies for attributes and competencies evaluated in part II, blocks f through k.
(10)
For “Interim Report” reason for submission selections, no box check selections will occur in part II, blocks f through k.
Narrative comments will be provided within part II, block l, assessing demonstrated performance against Army attributes, core leadership competencies, and course standards as of the “Thru” date on the report.
(11)
For courses requiring special projects (for example, white papers, thesis topics, or decision papers), list the titles of completed projects in part II, block m.