a.
Evaluation report reviews provide oversight of the evaluation reporting process, compliance with the policy guidance of this regulation, compliance with procedural guidance in DA Pam 623–3, and the accuracy of the completed report.
b.
For OERs, the review is normally an inherent responsibility of the senior rater.
A documented supplementary review will be performed by a uniformed Army advisor designated in the officers rating chain who is senior to the rated officer, and normally senior to the senior rater within the organization, in the following instances:
(1)
When there are no uniformed Army designated rating officials for the rated officer.
(2)
“Relief for Cause” reports when the senior rater is the individual directing the relief.
(3)
“Relief for Cause” reports directed by an individual other than the rating officials (see figs 2–3, 2–4, and 2–5).
c.
For NCOERs, in instances when a rated NCOs rating chain includes SGM/CSM, CW3 through CW5 or an Army officer in the rank of CPT or above as the senior rater, the senior rater will conduct the final rating chain review.
d.
A documented supplementary review will be performed by a uniformed Army advisor in the rank of SGM/CSM, CW3 through CW5, or CPT and above, designated in the NCOs rating chain, senior to the senior rater—
(1)
When a senior rater within the rated NCOs rating chain is an NCO in the rank of SFC through MSG/1SG.
(2)
When a senior rater within the rated NCOs rating chain is a warrant officer in the rank of WO1 through CW2.
(3)
When a senior rater within the rated NCOs rating chain is an Army officer in the rank of 2LT through 1LT.
(4)
When there are no uniformed Army designated rating officials for the rated NCO.
(5)
When the senior rater is not a uniformed Army designated rating official and the rater is in the rank of SGT through MSG/1SG.
(6)
When the senior rater is not a uniformed Army designated rating official and the rater is in the rank of WO1 through CW2.
(7)
When the senior rater is not a uniformed Army designated rating official and the rater is in the rank of 2LT through 1LT.
(8)
For all “Relief for Cause” evaluation reports when the senior rater is the individual directing the relief.
(9)
For all “Relief for Cause” evaluation reports directed by an individual other than the rating officials (see figs 2–3, 2–4, and 2–5).
e.
As an exception to requirements outlined in paragraph 2–8b, CSMs serving at the USASMA as Director, Sergeants Major Course or Director, Staff and Faculty may perform supplementary reviews for any NCO that their Deputy Director senior rates, without regard to date of rank.
Additionally, the Commandant and Deputy Commandant at USASMA, both nominative CSMs (TDA remarks code 8C), may serve as supplementary reviewer on any NCOER for which the Director, Sergeants Major Course or Director, Staff and Faculty serves as senior rater.
f.
An additional, yet undocumented, review of completed NCOERs should be done by the senior NCO in the organization to ensure oversight of NCOs’ performance.
g.
For DA Form 1059 and DA Form 1059–2, the reviewing official is a designated individual in the chain of supervision, as determined by the school commandant.
A documented supplementary review is required for academic failure evaluation reports.
h.
For DA Form 1059–1, an administrative review is conducted by HRC, Advanced Education Programs Branch (AHRC–OPL–C) and/or AMEDD Student Detachment (as applicable).
Unique situations exist when the installation education services officer may perform a review (see para 3–16).
