Slot machines on US military bases have a long and controversial history. They were once banned in 1951 due to concerns about their impact. Now, they have quietly reappeared, and today, they generate significant revenue and serve as a means of recreational activities for service members.
However, the debate over their presence has never truly gone away. Many argue that slot machines have no place on military bases and that their initial ban was a step in the right direction. Others believe that they provide harmless entertainment and financial benefits that outweigh any potential harm. This divergence of opinion raises an important question: Should the US military ban slot machines entirely on bases?
In this article, we’ll dive into the history and operation of slot machines on military bases and explore the arguments on both sides. Let’s get right into it!
Slot Machines on Bases: A Brief History
The first slot machine, which laid the foundation for the modern versions we know today, was invented in 1891. It quickly gained immense popularity at the time of its invention, with bars, casino houses, and other entertainment venues eagerly incorporating it into their spaces. Today, slot games have evolved to become the most popular gaming option in both land-based and online casinos, surpassing other games like roulette online, poker, baccarat, and others in terms of player appeal.
Many soldiers at the time were gambling in these civilian-run establishments, often in defiance of military orders. However, when the US Department of Defense decided to introduce slot machines into military bases back in the 1930s, they had free access to authorized, on-base slot machines.
These slot machines were introduced to help provide entertainment for troops stationed on bases, particularly those deployed overseas, where other forms of leisure activities were limited. It was also a means to generate additional revenue, which was often used to fund recreational and morale-boosting activities for service members.
One company that benefited immensely from this development was SEGA (Service Games). With just a few competitors in the market, SEGA took on the major role of distributing slot machines and other coin-operated devices to military bases.
The 1951 Ban
By 1951, SEGA had to stop operations due to the Gambling Devices Transportation Act promulgated in 1951. The legislation, which is commonly known as the Johnson Act, made it illegal to transport gambling devices across state lines, except in states where gambling was already legal. That same year, the US Congress also banned the presence and usage of slot machines from military bases within the country.
Since both Johnson’s legislation and the US Congress ban didn’t extend overseas, the distribution and usage of slot machines continued overseas. Specifically, SEGA decided to shift its focus to Japan, supplying slot machines to US bases in the Far East. That decision eventually laid the groundwork for SEGA’s evolution into a global gaming powerhouse.
Slot Machines on Military Bases Today
At some point in the 1970s, concerns about corruption, fraud, and the morality of gambling among service members had reached a boiling point. This led to an operation to clear out slot machines on US Military bases overseas.
However, not long after that, slot machines were reintroduced on overseas military bases in the 1980s. They were managed by the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) programs of different military branches. As they would claim, the reintroduction was a way to boost morale and offer soldiers a recreational outlet beyond their demanding duties.
Today, slot machines run freely on US military bases in 12 countries. According to reports, the DoD takes in around $100 million annually from over 3,000 of these machines.
Arguments on Both Sides of the Debate
Slot machines on US military bases remain a hot topic of debate today. The debate favoring the ban of these machines often centers around a few key concerns, including:
- Increased Risk of Gambling Addiction: First, there’s the increased risk of gambling addiction. Research shows that military personnel are 3.5 times more likely to develop gambling problems than civilians. This can lead to serious consequences like financial struggles, mental health issues, and even disciplinary action.
- Exploitation of Vulnerable Demographics: Another concern is the potential exploitation of vulnerable service members. Many soldiers are young, isolated, and dealing with stress, PTSD, or substance abuse, making them more susceptible to addiction. With easy access to slot machines on base, these risks are only amplified.
- Moral and Ethical Concerns: Finally, there are moral and ethical questions about the Department of Defense profiting from the gambling habits of service members. Critics argue that relying on gambling revenue goes against the military’s mission to promote healthy lifestyles and support its troops in meaningful ways.
On the other side of the debate, many people, and largely the Department of Defense, argue that slot machines can actually benefit service members in several ways. Their reasons include:
- Revenue for Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) Programs: For one, they generate over $100 million annually for Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) programs, which fund activities like golf courses and family centers. Without this income, these programs could suffer, affecting the quality of life for service members.
- Entertainment and stress relief: Additionally, slot machines offer a recreational outlet, especially on remote bases, with few entertainment options. Many service members see them as a harmless way to unwind rather than a path to addiction.
- Harm Reduction: There’s also the argument that gambling on base is safer than off-base options, where stakes and risks could be much higher. Keeping gambling on base ensures that service members engage in a more controlled, regulated environment instead of risking exposure to illegal or unregulated venues.
Conclusion
The decision to ban slot machines on military bases is a complex one involving ethical, financial, and practical considerations. While these games provide substantial funding for programs that enhance the lives of service members and their families, their presence raises questions about exploitation and readiness. Ultimately, the military must weigh the benefits against the potential harm to determine the best path forward.
Born and raised in Bozeman, Montana, he graduated from George State University with an MBA in Actuarial Science. His hobbies include beach volleyball, hiking, fishing, and lifting weights
George is also a certified nutritionist with a passion for health and fitness.
- Gambling and the US Army: The History of Card Games During Military Deployments - January 21, 2025
- A Student’s Guide: How to Write an Essay on the Importance of Physical Fitness in the Army - January 20, 2025
- Discipline and Achievement: What Army Training Can Teach Students about Goal Setting - January 20, 2025